Emergency Child Custody Filings in Clark County, NV

mother holding her child with court order in hand and upset father in background, representing an emergency child custody order

When a child is in immediate danger, waiting weeks for a standard court hearing is not an option. Clark County Family Court allows parents to request emergency custody orders, but these filings are reserved for true crises. The legal standard is high, the process is fast-moving, and mistakes can have serious consequences.

Emergency custody is not about parenting disagreements or schedule frustrations. It is about protecting a child from immediate and irreparable harm.

Understanding when—and how—to act can make all the difference.

What Qualifies as an Emergency Child Custody Situation in Nevada?

Nevada courts narrowly define what counts as a custody emergency. Judges expect clear, specific evidence showing that a child is at risk right now.

Situations that may qualify include:

  • Physical abuse or credible threats of violence
  • Severe neglect or unsafe living conditions
  • A parent’s active substance abuse that endangers the child
  • Domestic violence occurring in the child’s presence
  • A credible threat that a parent will flee Nevada with the child

Disagreements over discipline, missed visitation, or school preferences—even serious ones—generally do not meet the emergency threshold.

Emergency Custody vs. Standard Custody Filings in Clark County

Knowing which path to take is critical.

Standard custody filings typically take five to eight weeks before a judge hears the case. These are used for routine custody modifications, parenting time disputes, or schedule changes.

Emergency custody filings, by contrast, can be reviewed within 24 to 72 hours. They require detailed sworn affidavits explaining the danger and why waiting for a standard hearing would put the child at risk.

Filing an emergency motion without sufficient evidence can damage your credibility with the court—making it harder to obtain relief later.

How Emergency Custody Filings Work in Clark County Family Court

Most emergency custody cases are filed with an Order Shortening Time (OST). This asks the court to accelerate review and schedule a hearing quickly.

In true emergencies, a judge may review the request ex parte, meaning without first hearing from the other parent. This does not end the case. A full hearing with both parents is required shortly afterward to ensure due process.

Because judges make decisions quickly based on written evidence, precision and clarity matter. Vague accusations or emotional arguments are rarely effective.

Related Emergency Tools: TPOs and Pickup Orders

Emergency custody filings are often paired with other protective orders.

  • Temporary Protective Orders (TPOs): Focus on protecting an adult from abuse or harassment.
  • Pickup Orders: In extreme situations, judges may authorize law enforcement to recover a child who is being unlawfully withheld.

Each tool serves a different legal purpose, and using the wrong one can delay protection.

FAQs About Emergency Custody in Nevada

In Clark County, a judge may review an emergency request within 24 hours and set a hearing within a few days if the situation warrants it.

Yes, in true emergencies. However, the court will require a prompt follow-up hearing where both parents can be heard.

No. Emergency orders are temporary and designed to stabilize the situation until the court can conduct a full review.


Talk to Smith Legal Group About Emergency Child Custody in Clark County

Emergency child custody cases move quickly and leave little room for error. At Smith Legal Group, we help Clark County parents assess whether an emergency filing is appropriate and prepare focused, credible evidence for the court.

If your child is at risk and you need immediate legal guidance, contact Smith Legal Group at 702-410-5001 to schedule your free consultation and take action with clarity and urgency

Disclaimer: The information in this blog post is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this blog post should be construed as legal advice. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in this blog post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.